Ready to suspend logic, belief and commonsense? Willing to sit back and let all your senses be assaulted and have the pleasure of paying for it all?! Welcome to the world of movies, my friends. Read on for a raving blogfest of my opinions. Because I love you.
My daughter and I decided to watch (with a little skepticism) a film recommended by a friend called ‘August Rush’. She was convinced that her razor-sharp university-refined education would prove it to be a pile of sentimental schmuck. Hence, we were both prepared to pull the plug after five minutes of torture. Perhaps we were also both subliminally ready to relax our critical guards and be taken for an entertaining ride.
Well, we were hooked from the opening scene of a boy in a field conducting wheat in the wind to the closing, his musical finale set in New York’s Central Park. There was also some good acting from the cast especially Robin Williams and Freddie Highmore, some really good music (and guitar playing) plus a fairytale story that held a fine line between absurdity and the believable. Perhaps we were just in the mood for ‘feelgoods’ that night. You might like it. But there wasn’t much violence so….
I worry sometimes about our thirst for ‘entertainment’, especially when someone is trying to sell it to us as a society, a community. I mean, do we dare to stop and look critically at what others hold up as examples of movies that are hailed as ‘works of art‘ and ‘pure genius’?
Let me take a case in point and be controversial from the start. Christopher Nolan’s ‘The Dark Knight’ with Heath Ledger’s insane Joker has received overwhelming high praise. IGN. coms’s review is typical in its raving enthusiasm. They say that of course, the film is ‘a work of art’ but also ‘…the violence is the most intense…ever seen in a PG13 film.” ( Yes, for thirteen year olds. Thanks for caring so much). Apparently the knife-wielding murderer is ‘transcendant’ as well as a character of ‘abject insanity’. The long argument goes that this is a look at society and its need for heroes, that here Nolan has broken new ground by making a comic-book character quite ‘your man in the street’ and unclear in himself about anything anymore. Thus his anti-thesis, the Joker has a ‘reason’ to exist, to balance the forces at work in our confused world. Apparently it’s a ‘substantive and philosophical examination’ of our needs. But seriously, holy groans, Batman!
Lighten up Toby! It’s only a movie.
True but… Isn’t it a manufactured experience designed to have a certain effect on me- like a theme park ride where you pay to strap yourself in and leave your body to the G-forces of spinouts and dives? Why should I go on a ride to feel really awful? To cheer about how lousy I felt at the end?
Yes, it’s only a movie. So I watched it to make an informed opinion. IT’S A REAL SUCKFEST OF A MOVIE!!!!!!! At the end of the story I felt kind of filthy, trashed, tired, very uneasy, un-empowered, emotionally violated and a little hopeless. Probably exactly how Nolan wanted me to feel. Thanks. Now, that’s entertainment!
So I went outside into the garden and looked up to see the refreshing show of the endless dark night, stars and pure creation. After ten minutes I went back indoors feeling my spirit repaired somewhat (you are just way too sensitive!).
Rolling Stone Magazine’s Peter Travers calls Nolan’s work ‘haunting and visionary’ and also ends his review by saying ‘…just try to get it out of your dreams’.
You know what I’m going to say. Why should I use up time and money for you to give me nightmares??!!
Quality! I demand it of the arts. Don’t waste my God-given brief life with anything else but your best. Stop spitting at me, you cultural vultures. Why should any of us accept anything less than the amazing incredible best you movie makers have to share? Popcorn anyone?